Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com>
Cc: "Raymond O'Donnell" <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?
Date: 2009-01-29 17:47:55
Message-ID: 9400.1233251275@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com> writes:
> Hello Ray,
> Yes, that's clear. But there was even some stuff which isn't dumped with
> pg_dumpall (as far as I read).

Perhaps you were reading some extremely obsolete information?
It used to be that pg_dumpall couldn't dump large objects,
but that was a long time back.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-01-29 17:51:42 Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-01-29 17:45:25 Re: [GENERAL] Encoding problem using pg_dumpall