| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Failures with gcd functions with GCC snapshots GCC and -O3 (?) |
| Date: | 2021-06-05 14:31:32 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2106051630270.1661092@pseudo |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> serinus has been complaining about the new gcd functions in 13~:
>>
>> moonjelly, which also runs a bleeding-edge gcc, started to fail the same
>> way at about the same time. Given that none of our code in that area
>> has changed, it's hard to think it's anything but a broken compiler.
>
>> Maybe somebody should report that to gcc upstream?
>
> Yes.
>
> I will isolate a small case (hopefully) and do a report over week-end, after
> checking that the latest version is still broken.
Not needed in the end, the problem has disappeared with today's
gcc recompilation.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-06-05 15:02:49 | Re: libpq debug log |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2021-06-05 14:16:20 | Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? |