Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?
Date: 2020-09-11 12:58:51
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2009111453050.3995562@pseudo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On 2020-09-08 21:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> I see this only applied to master. Shouldn't this be backpatched?
>
> I wasn't planning to. It's not a bug fix.
>
> Other thoughts?

Yep. ISTM nicer if all docs have the same navigation, especially as
googling often points to random versions. No big deal anyway, in six year
all supported versions will have a up link on the part level! :-)

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2020-09-11 13:59:12 Re: pgbench and timestamps (bounced)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-09-11 12:47:33 Re: copyright problem in REL_13_STABLE