Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?
Date: 2020-09-12 18:37:52
Message-ID: 446378b9-e5bf-f9dd-8fb2-194715eaec44@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-09-11 14:58, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>> On 2020-09-08 21:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>> I see this only applied to master. Shouldn't this be backpatched?
>>
>> I wasn't planning to. It's not a bug fix.
>>
>> Other thoughts?
>
> Yep. ISTM nicer if all docs have the same navigation, especially as
> googling often points to random versions. No big deal anyway, in six year
> all supported versions will have a up link on the part level! :-)

Okay, backpatched to PG10.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-12 22:00:07 Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-12 17:57:21 Re: Parallel worker hangs while handling errors.