Re: moonjelly vs tsearch

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: moonjelly vs tsearch
Date: 2019-09-02 04:58:42
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1909020651130.11815@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> News from Fabien's bleeding edge compiler zoo: apparently GCC 10
> 20190831 thinks the tsearch test should produce different output than
> 20190824 did. It looks like the parsing of question marks change...

Indeed, that looks pretty strange.

> I can't wait for next week's installment.

I'll relaunch gcc trunk compilation before the end of the week.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message amul sul 2019-09-02 05:08:02 Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2019-09-02 04:54:11 Bug in GiST paring heap comparator