moonjelly vs tsearch

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: moonjelly vs tsearch
Date: 2019-09-02 03:56:46
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJHBfM3RvLPPtA6f_caL69MV+rKe71rZ+ZQmTViQqts6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

News from Fabien's bleeding edge compiler zoo: apparently GCC 10
20190831 thinks the tsearch test should produce different output than
20190824 did. It looks like the parsing of question marks change...
I can't wait for next week's installment.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-09-02 04:16:45 Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2019-09-02 02:19:24 safe to overload objectSubId for a type?