Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?

From: Tony Finch <dot(at)dotat(dot)at>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date: 2017-05-05 18:52:42
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.11.1705051950440.24591@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> wrote:
>
> There's a well-written article I saw recently that directly addresses
> your question ... I'm too lazy to find it, but google will probably
> turn it up for you.

This? http://renesd.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/is-postgresql-good-enough.html

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot(at)dotat(dot)at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode
Irish Sea: East or northeast 5 or 6. Slight or moderate. Fair. Good.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2017-05-05 20:03:29 Re: Vaccum Query
Previous Message John R Pierce 2017-05-05 18:46:55 Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?