Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Tony Finch <dot(at)dotat(dot)at>
Cc: Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date: 2017-05-05 20:21:24
Message-ID: 20170505162124.c3b2ced0802b3a17eaf43b26@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 5 May 2017 19:52:42 +0100
Tony Finch <dot(at)dotat(dot)at> wrote:

> Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > There's a well-written article I saw recently that directly addresses
> > your question ... I'm too lazy to find it, but google will probably
> > turn it up for you.
>
> This? http://renesd.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/is-postgresql-good-enough.html

Oh, hey! You found it, thanks!

--
Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mathieu Fenniak 2017-05-05 20:24:07 Logical decoding CPU-bound w/ large number of tables
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2017-05-05 20:19:25 Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?