Re: Best suiting OS

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best suiting OS
Date: 2009-10-02 14:23:23
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.0910021521310.19472@aragorn.flymine.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> writes:
>> The reason we switched that machine to Debian was due to the
>> postgresql-devel package being missing for Red Hat. We need that package
>> in order to install some of our more interesting extensions. A quick look
>> at http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/8.4/fedora/fedora-9-x86_64/ indicates that
>> this package is still missing.
>
> You switched OSes instead of complaining to the repository maintainer
> that he'd forgotten a subpackage? You must have a lot of time on your
> hands.

Camel's back, straw.

Besides, both I and our sysadmin are much more used to Debian. We were
dealing with an old install of RH from our old sysadmin and couldn't be
bothered to work out the Red Hat Way(tm). Much easier to un-switch OSes.

Matthew

--
I work for an investment bank. I have dealt with code written by stock
exchanges. I have seen how the computer systems that store your money are
run. If I ever make a fortune, I will store it in gold bullion under my
bed. -- Matthew Crosby

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Mielke 2009-10-02 15:41:51 Re: Best suiting OS
Previous Message Joe Uhl 2009-10-02 14:23:09 Re: Best suiting OS