Re: Best suiting OS

From: Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>
To: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best suiting OS
Date: 2009-10-02 15:41:51
Message-ID: 4AC61F3F.9040700@mark.mielke.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 10/02/2009 10:23 AM, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You switched OSes instead of complaining to the repository maintainer
>> that he'd forgotten a subpackage? You must have a lot of time on your
>> hands.
>
> Camel's back, straw.
>
> Besides, both I and our sysadmin are much more used to Debian. We were
> dealing with an old install of RH from our old sysadmin and couldn't
> be bothered to work out the Red Hat Way(tm). Much easier to un-switch
> OSes.

... until you move on and leave the company with some hacked up Debian
installs that nobody knows how to manage.

Just throwing that out there. :-)

Cheers,
mark

--
Mark Mielke<mark(at)mielke(dot)cc>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2009-10-02 15:43:59 Re: Best suiting OS - now off topic
Previous Message Matthew Wakeling 2009-10-02 14:23:23 Re: Best suiting OS