Re: Best suiting OS

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best suiting OS
Date: 2009-10-02 11:39:39
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.0910021232050.19472@aragorn.flymine.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
>> For comparison, with Red Hat, you will need to upgrade to a whole new
>> distribution whenever you want updated software, which is a much bigger
>> undertaking.
>
> This is somewhat true for larger packages, but it's not the case for
> PostgreSQL. You certainly can grab newer RPMs from
> https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgcore and install them.

The reason we switched that machine to Debian was due to the
postgresql-devel package being missing for Red Hat. We need that package
in order to install some of our more interesting extensions. A quick look
at http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/8.4/fedora/fedora-9-x86_64/ indicates that
this package is still missing. Because Debian includes Postgres in its
main package repository and uses automated build tools, Debian is unlikely
to suffer the same fate.

Matthew

--
I'm always interested when [cold callers] try to flog conservatories.
Anyone who can actually attach a conservatory to a fourth floor flat
stands a marginally better than average chance of winning my custom.
(Seen on Usenet)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2009-10-02 12:30:29 Re: Best suiting OS
Previous Message Scara Maccai 2009-10-02 09:28:17 Re: Best suiting OS