From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 9.0 release timetable |
Date: | 2010-05-31 15:28:46 |
Message-ID: | alpine.BSF.2.00.1005311227400.75550@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
> I find myself entirely unimpressed by proposals to make releases
> according to some rigid schedule that takes no account of whether
> packaging manpower is actually available.
How many beta testers out there *rely* on a package to do their testing?
I'm not saying don't try and get packages in place, I'm just saying it
shouldn't be a requirement to stamp code BETA and create a tar ball ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-05-31 15:29:40 | Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-31 15:24:44 | Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature |