Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Date: 2010-05-31 15:28:46
Message-ID: alpine.BSF.2.00.1005311227400.75550@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 31 May 2010, Tom Lane wrote:

> I find myself entirely unimpressed by proposals to make releases
> according to some rigid schedule that takes no account of whether
> packaging manpower is actually available.

How many beta testers out there *rely* on a package to do their testing?
I'm not saying don't try and get packages in place, I'm just saying it
shouldn't be a requirement to stamp code BETA and create a tar ball ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-31 15:29:40 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-31 15:24:44 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature