| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 9.0 release timetable |
| Date: | 2010-05-31 15:30:24 |
| Message-ID: | 201005311530.o4VFUO102558@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I find myself entirely unimpressed by proposals to make releases
> > according to some rigid schedule that takes no account of whether
> > packaging manpower is actually available.
>
> How many beta testers out there *rely* on a package to do their testing?
> I'm not saying don't try and get packages in place, I'm just saying it
> shouldn't be a requirement to stamp code BETA and create a tar ball ...
Well, they can just grab nightly snapshots and test, right? I don't
think a beta is fundamentally different from a nightly snapshot,
source-code wise.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-05-31 15:34:00 | Re: PG 9.0 release timetable |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-05-31 15:29:40 | Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature |