Re: Query performance

From: S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query performance
Date: 2009-10-12 14:52:53
Message-ID: abf9211d0910120752o6c565ea8pde99de2c157d6f6d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Thanks Grzegorz,
But work memory is for each process (connection) rt? so if i keep
more then 10MB will not affect the overall performance ?

Arvind S

2009/10/12 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>

> btw, what's the version of db ?
> what's the work_mem setting ?
>
> try setting work_mem to higher value. As postgresql will fallback to disc
> sorting if the content doesn't fit in work_mem, which it probably doesn't
> (8.4+ show the memory usage for sorting, which your explain doesn't have).
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-10-12 15:10:51 Re: Query performance
Previous Message S Arvind 2009-10-12 14:45:47 Re: Query performance