Re: Query performance

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query performance
Date: 2009-10-12 15:10:51
Message-ID: 2f4958ff0910120810o20b2fbceva75d8ea15cd92848@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2009/10/12 S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>

> Thanks Grzegorz,
> But work memory is for each process (connection) rt? so if i keep
> more then 10MB will not affect the overall performance ?
>
it will. But the memory is only allocated when needed.
You can always set it before running that particular query, and than put it
back to default value.
just use SET work_mem=64MB

Mind you , postgresql requires more memory to sort same set of data on disc
than on memory. Your explain analyze indicates, that it used 2912kB , which
means your work_mem value is set to some ridiculously low value. Put it up
to 8MB or something, and retry.

--
GJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-10-12 15:26:44 Re: Best suiting OS
Previous Message S Arvind 2009-10-12 14:52:53 Re: Query performance