Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Date: 2020-03-06 13:22:20
Message-ID: ab61d6ab-c70f-c8b7-57ad-30530ed738f3@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/03/06 10:40, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:40:54AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Seems reasonable, but it would be better if people proposed these
>> kinds of changes closer to the beginning of the release cycle rather
>> than in the crush at the end.
>
> +1, to both points.

Ok, I'm fine to do that in v14.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-03-06 13:42:18 Re: Allowing ALTER TYPE to change storage strategy
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-03-06 13:18:26 Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion