Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Date: 2020-03-06 01:40:04
Message-ID: 20200306014004.GF52814@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:40:54AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Seems reasonable, but it would be better if people proposed these
> kinds of changes closer to the beginning of the release cycle rather
> than in the crush at the end.

+1, to both points.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-06 02:09:06 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-06 01:38:44 Re: reindex concurrently and two toast indexes