Re: doc patch: clarify the naming rule for injection_points

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: 'Aleksander Alekseev' <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc patch: clarify the naming rule for injection_points
Date: 2025-04-22 03:43:06
Message-ID: aAcQSiAtBJqgaOip@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 12:10:51PM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Thanks for suggesting them. ISTM, you are correct. PSA updated version.

Thanks, I've applied some slight tweaks, and applied the result down
to v17, leaving the heap_update point alone.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-04-22 03:45:43 Re: bug: virtual generated column can be partition key
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-04-22 03:23:36 Re: Fix slot synchronization with two_phase decoding enabled