| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
| Date: | 2018-06-04 21:44:05 |
| Message-ID: | a91f16cd-ebc3-9176-3a3a-561c8dc7b3f3@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/2/18 16:50, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 08/03/18 14:13, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> There are two failures in the SSL tests that I cannot explain. The
>> tests are for some rather obscure configurations, so the changed
>> behaviors are not obviously wrong, perhaps legitimate implementation
>> differences. But someone wrote those tests with a purpose (probably),
>> so we should have some kind of explanation for the regressions.
>
> I applied this over commit 4e0c743c18 (because this doesn't compile
> against current master, needs rebasing), and ran "make check" in
> src/test/ssl. All the tests passed. I'm using GnuTLS version 3.5.8. What
> failures did you see?
The patch adjusts the expected test results so that the tests pass.
Look for the tests named
- "connect with server CA cert, without root CA"
- "CRL belonging to a different CA"
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-04 21:53:45 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-04 21:40:43 | Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |