| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
| Date: | 2018-06-02 20:50:49 |
| Message-ID: | 7bd8837f-5136-0ea1-4f76-fbacf525ea1e@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/03/18 14:13, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There are two failures in the SSL tests that I cannot explain. The
> tests are for some rather obscure configurations, so the changed
> behaviors are not obviously wrong, perhaps legitimate implementation
> differences. But someone wrote those tests with a purpose (probably),
> so we should have some kind of explanation for the regressions.
I applied this over commit 4e0c743c18 (because this doesn't compile
against current master, needs rebasing), and ran "make check" in
src/test/ssl. All the tests passed. I'm using GnuTLS version 3.5.8. What
failures did you see?
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lætitia Avrot | 2018-06-02 20:52:58 | Constraint documentation |
| Previous Message | Michael White | 2018-06-02 20:15:36 | Re: New committers announced at PGCon 2018 |