Re: [PATCH]Add tab completion for foreigh table

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Add tab completion for foreigh table
Date: 2022-01-13 03:38:12
Message-ID: a915e3cd-39ab-f85a-ab94-bd345f258d68@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022/01/11 21:43, tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attached a patch to improve the tab completion for foreigh table.

Thanks!

Isn't it better to tab-complete not only "PARTITION OF" but also "(" for CREATE FOREIGN TABLE?

> Also modified some DOC description of ALTER TABLE at [1] in according with CREATE INDEX at [2].
>
> In [1], we use "ALTER INDEX ATTACH PARTITION"
> In [2], we use "ALTER INDEX ... ATTACH PARTITION"
>
> I think the format in [2] is better.

Agreed.

IMO it's better to make the docs changes in separate patch because they are not directly related to the improvement of tab-completion.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2022-01-13 03:52:46 Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-01-13 03:19:27 Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)