Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?
Date: 2020-03-11 10:25:17
Message-ID: a7f8c2d5-dccd-e9dc-859f-6fc5f1581b03@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-03-04 17:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is the third patch again, we renaming durable_link_or_rename() to
> durable_rename_excl(). This seems to match existing Unix system call
> naming best (see open() flag O_EXCL, and macOS has a renamex_np() flag
> RENAME_EXCL).

committed like that

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hugh McMaster 2020-03-11 10:37:01 Re: [PATCH] Use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to detect the libxml2 library
Previous Message Hugh McMaster 2020-03-11 10:24:10 Re: [PATCH] Use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to detect the libxml2 library