Re: New versioning scheme

From: Chris Mair <chris(at)1006(dot)org>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New versioning scheme
Date: 2016-05-13 11:39:31
Message-ID: a7a0385c511ba96085167322769322fd@smtp.hushmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> so renaming the current 9.6 as 10, or the next (9.7) as 10 - seems quite reasonable to me.

Hi,

is renaming the current 9.6 as 10 still an option, now that 9.6 beta 1 has been released?

Bye,
Chris.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-05-13 12:22:09 Re: New versioning scheme
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2016-05-13 10:07:07 Re: New versioning scheme