Re: New versioning scheme

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chris Mair <chris(at)1006(dot)org>
Cc: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New versioning scheme
Date: 2016-05-13 12:22:09
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ4ugcpD6BbWxp-RtZb4FuEX0koBwYY+mYqux8UeH-FMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Chris Mair <chris(at)1006(dot)org> wrote:
> is renaming the current 9.6 as 10 still an option, now that 9.6 beta 1 has
> been released?

Point of history: there has been 8.5 alpha 1, 2 and 3 before it was
renamed to 9.0.

(No opinion on the debate to offer to be honest)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2016-05-13 12:27:55 Re: When should be advocate external projects?
Previous Message Chris Mair 2016-05-13 11:39:31 Re: New versioning scheme