Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf
Date: 2023-01-10 14:42:19
Message-ID: a58d1a21-6f82-2675-fddc-9d24b3994d6d@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-01-10 Tu 07:09, Jelte Fennema wrote:
> Having looked closer now, I'm pretty sure you should base this patch
> on top of my patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/4081/
> Mainly because you also need the token version of pg_role, which is
> one of the things my patch adds.

Ok, that sounds reasonable, but the cfbot doesn't like patches that
depend on other patches in a different email. Maybe you can roll this up
as an extra patch in your next version? It's pretty small.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2023-01-10 14:43:42 Re: MERGE ... WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE
Previous Message Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu) 2023-01-10 14:41:44 RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)