From: | "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Dilip Kumar' <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com" <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "euler(at)eulerto(dot)com" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com" <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br" <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com" <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |
Date: | 2023-01-10 14:41:44 |
Message-ID: | TYCPR01MB8373A5C77597418E85CF6109EDFF9@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 11:28 AM I wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 6:29 PM Tuesday, December 27, 2022 6:29 PM
> wrote:
> > Thanks for reviewing our patch! PSA new version patch set.
> Now, the patches fails to apply to the HEAD, because of recent commits
> (c6e1f62e2c and 216a784829c) as reported in [1].
>
> I'll rebase the patch with other changes when I post a new version.
This is done in the patch in [1].
Please note that because of the commit c6e1f62e2c,
we don't need the 1st patch we borrowed from another thread in [2] any more.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TYCPR01MB837340F78F4A16F542589195EDFF9%40TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20221122004119.GA132961%40nathanxps13
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-01-10 14:42:19 | Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-10 14:34:39 | Re: [PATCH] random_normal function |