Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)jirotech(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached
Date: 2021-11-24 00:39:49
Message-ID: a1cf34b2-5b4f-3ab1-3ecb-d28c76a10a3c@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/23/21 16:23, James Sewell wrote:
>
> The enterprisedb is one of their customized versions?
>
> rundeck_cluster below refers to
> https://digital.ai/technology/rundeck
> <https://digital.ai/technology/rundeck>?
>
>
> re: EnterpriseDB yes it is - I'm having this same discussion with them
> in parallel

What version of theirs?

> re: rundeck, yes - but this is only one of many things connecting. it's
> not doing anything special.

Except sending a stream of connections to the server.

Any idea what they are doing?

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Sewell 2021-11-24 00:58:58 Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached
Previous Message James Sewell 2021-11-24 00:23:38 Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached