From: | James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)jirotech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached |
Date: | 2021-11-24 00:58:58 |
Message-ID: | CAANVwEuRj8G2Z19WKT3Z2+EyKrX_EcPBjwnVwDV6To=mcux2uw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > re: EnterpriseDB yes it is - I'm having this same discussion with them
> > in parallel
>
> What version of theirs?
>
PostgreSQL 11.9 (EnterpriseDB Advanced Server 11.9.18) on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat
4.8.5-36), 64-bit
>
>
> > re: rundeck, yes - but this is only one of many things connecting. it's
> > not doing anything special.
>
> Except sending a stream of connections to the server.
>
> Any idea what they are doing?
>
It's used to trigger ETL jobs. There are other bigger consumers of
connections - the issue isn't the stream of jobs, that works fine under
normal operation. The issue is that when jobs stay in "startup" and don't
enter pg_stat_activity the system spirals downwards and no new connections
are allowed.
James
--
The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or
professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this
email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this
communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or
otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your
incorrect receipt of this correspondence.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2021-11-24 01:46:47 | Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2021-11-24 00:39:49 | Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached |