From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there a way to use "pack" in pl/perl without resorting to pl/perlu? |
Date: | 2012-09-13 17:40:44 |
Message-ID: | a1862a14f2955a72fa7511bcd05de3fe@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Tom Lane replied:
> My recollection is that they're intentionally excluded because they
> would otherwise be security holes --- there are some format codes that
> allow direct access to memory, or something like that.
They are not part of the standard "base core" opcode group, but part
of the "still_to_be_decided" group, because they can create and use
memory pointers. It's possible that they may someday get moved out
of this group, in which case they will suddenly start working :)
Herouth Maoz wrote:
> Anyway, I replaced the functionality with
> $content =~ s/([a-fA-F0-9]{2})/chr(hex($1))/eg;
> which seems to be doing the same thing as unpack( "H*", $content )
They are not doing the same thing, so be careful. :)
> I suspect it's less efficient than unpack, and I hope the function
> I created won't be too slow for use inside a trigger.
You should be fine with either one. While the unpack is indeed
around 3x faster, a simple s/// like the above still runs at over
220,000 times per second on my slow box, so I would not worry
about the speed. Remember in general to add a /o to the end of your
regex if the first part is constant to avoid unneeded recomplilation.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201209131324
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAlBSGn4ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiLCQCePwOEYvm52IdIc3tQh5KafrfR
vnYAn0zufZffao1VxhKwquVi6OkIHdz5
=7BQ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Christensen | 2012-09-13 17:41:04 | Re: What is the state of the art for using LINQ with PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Alex Lai | 2012-09-13 17:28:41 | Re: Planner forces seq scan when select without quoting its values |