| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i |
| Date: | 2025-03-06 12:32:14 |
| Message-ID: | a141ae990b72eadcdbcf79efaa268ac5696f7bdb.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 09:33 +0000, Abraham, Danny wrote:
> We have hundreds of pg servers (mainly linux).
> App is 7×24.
> We think that patching the server to 15.12.will cost about 30 times
> more compared to patching the pg client ( mainly qa effort).
I don't think so. Don't do any QA when installing a PostgreSQL patch
(just roll it out on the test systems first to see if your installation
procedure works).
Down time because of data corruption will cost *way* more than patching.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-03-06 13:31:54 | Re: Quesion about querying distributed databases |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-03-06 12:01:32 | Re: Quesion about querying distributed databases |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-03-07 13:24:57 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2025-03-06 10:08:42 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i |