| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i |
| Date: | 2025-03-07 13:24:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmJgHvPooiXZ5vzvONMWjcazg+Z4VEPrHW_NVFmUvYAX2g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
CVE-2025-1094 has a narrow blast radius. If you are not directly affected,
I would focus your efforts on getting to 17. But the lack of an existing
process to smoothly upgrade minor revisions is worrying and something that
needs to get addressed as well.
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-03-07 13:45:12 | Re: Review my steps for rollback to restore point |
| Previous Message | Bartosz Stalewski | 2025-03-07 11:16:38 | Vacuum related question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | bill.poole | 2025-03-13 04:05:34 | Bulk DML performance |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-03-06 12:32:14 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i |