From: | Dan Sugalski <dan(at)sidhe(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Havasvölgyi Ottó <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: feeding big script to psql |
Date: | 2005-08-02 13:05:55 |
Message-ID: | a0623090bbf151e9e67e1@[172.24.18.155] |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 1:57 PM +0200 8/2/05, Havasvölgyi Ottó wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Now I am at 7 MB, and the reading speed is 3-4KB/sec.
Have you checked to see if you're swapping as
this goes on, either in the client or on the
server?
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
>To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 1:31 PM
>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>The effect is the same even if I redirect the
>>output to file with the -o switch.
>>At the beginning 200 KB/sec, at 1.5 MB the speed is less than 20 KB/sec.
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>Otto
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
>>To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>>Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:24 AM
>>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql
>>
>>>Tom,
>>>
>>>Thanks for the suggestion. I have just applied
>>>both switch , -f (I have applied this in the
>>>previous case too) and -n, but it becomes slow
>>>again. At the beginning it reads about 300 KB
>>>a second, and when it has read 1.5 MB, it
>>>reads only about 10 KB a second, it slows down
>>>gradually. Maybe others should also try this
>>>scenario. Can I help anything?
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Otto
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>>>To: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
>>>Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:54 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql
>>>
>>>>=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu> writes:
>>>>>I know it would be faster with COPY, but this is extremly slow, and the
>>>>>bottleneck is psql.
>>>>>What is the problem?
>>>>
>>>>Hmm, does the Windows port have readline support, and if so does adding
>>>>the "-n" switch to the psql invocation fix the problem? Or you could
>>>>try feeding the script with -f switch or \i rather than "psql <script".
>>>>Readline adds a fair amount of overhead, which is completely invisible
>>>>at human typing speeds but can be annoying when reading scripts.
>>>>
>>>>regards, tom lane
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>>TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
--
Dan
--------------------------------------it's like this-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan(at)sidhe(dot)org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jake Stride | 2005-08-02 13:07:26 | Re: Indexes |
Previous Message | Peter Wilson | 2005-08-02 12:28:57 | Re: Indexes |