From: | Havasvölgyi Ottó <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: feeding big script to psql |
Date: | 2005-08-02 11:57:35 |
Message-ID: | 00a501c59759$5f522670$8000a8c0@OTTO |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
Now I am at 7 MB, and the reading speed is 3-4KB/sec.
Best Regards,
Otto
----- Original Message -----
From: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql
> Hi,
>
> The effect is the same even if I redirect the output to file with the -o
> switch.
> At the beginning 200 KB/sec, at 1.5 MB the speed is less than 20 KB/sec.
>
> Best Regards,
> Otto
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
> To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql
>
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I have just applied both switch , -f (I have
>> applied this in the previous case too) and -n, but it becomes slow again.
>> At the beginning it reads about 300 KB a second, and when it has read 1.5
>> MB, it reads only about 10 KB a second, it slows down gradually. Maybe
>> others should also try this scenario. Can I help anything?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Otto
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>> To: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
>> Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql
>>
>>
>>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu> writes:
>>>> I know it would be faster with COPY, but this is extremly slow, and the
>>>> bottleneck is psql.
>>>> What is the problem?
>>>
>>> Hmm, does the Windows port have readline support, and if so does adding
>>> the "-n" switch to the psql invocation fix the problem? Or you could
>>> try feeding the script with -f switch or \i rather than "psql <script".
>>> Readline adds a fair amount of overhead, which is completely invisible
>>> at human typing speeds but can be annoying when reading scripts.
>>>
>>> regards, tom lane
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kilian Hagemann | 2005-08-02 12:07:27 | Re: Indexes |
Previous Message | Jake Stride | 2005-08-02 11:52:33 | Indexes |