From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section |
Date: | 2018-08-28 13:31:32 |
Message-ID: | a05348feb82d78070bea9c0a03fcd572@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 2018-08-28 13:39, Dave Page wrote:
<snip>
> I did;
>
> *==>** The following existing directories will be made group writable:*
>
> /usr/local/bin
>
> /usr/local/lib
>
> /usr/local/share
>
> /usr/local/var
>
> *==>** The following existing directories will have their owner set to
> *
> *dpage*:
>
> /usr/local/bin
>
> /usr/local/lib
>
> /usr/local/share
>
> /usr/local/var
>
> *==>** The following existing directories will have their group set to
> *
> *admin*:
>
> /usr/local/bin
>
> /usr/local/lib
>
> /usr/local/share
>
> /usr/local/var
>
> I would rather we don't list a distro, than list one that we have to
> put
> security warnings against.
Isn't OSX/macOS considered a "single user" system for the vast majority
of its users?
Note - I'm meaning "single person has access to the machine", rather
than talking about the process separation model.
For a single user machine, the above setup doesn't seem terrible. It's
not giving world writeable access, it's just claiming ownership of
otherwise unused directories for the main users group.
?
Anyone using OSX/macOS in multi-user fashion is probably going to hit
other issues too (eg other people's apps in /Applications), and probably
:) avoids Homebrew.
+ Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2018-08-28 13:35:33 | Re: Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2018-08-28 12:39:32 | Re: Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section |