| From: | Joel Stevenson <jstevenson(at)bearriver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SERIAL Field |
| Date: | 2002-05-06 20:57:40 |
| Message-ID: | a0511170cb8fc9c4efa8b@[192.168.1.100] |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
>
>People who have not studied the documentation frequently make that
>claim. *There is no such risk* (unless A and B are interleaving their
>commands on a single database connection, in which case they have lots
>worse risks of conflicts than this one). See
>http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.2/postgres/functions-sequence.html
>
> regards, tom lane
Point taken. I've worked on web-apps which use a single JDBC
connection per user session where the overlap could occur, but as you
say there are far greater issues involved for such session-based
connections.
--
Joel Stevenson
Bear River Associates, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | otisg | 2002-05-07 03:47:31 | Re: Dying PostgreSQL backend |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-06 20:16:31 | Re: SERIAL Field |