| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Document for wal_log_hints |
| Date: | 2024-11-19 01:13:02 |
| Message-ID: | ZzvmHoKcz9oDoXTZ@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 09:03:57AM +0800, Andy Fan wrote:
> So if data checksums is enabled, nothing can be tested when turning
> wal_log_hints on/off.
> @@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ include_dir 'conf.d'
> If data checksums are enabled, hint bit updates are always WAL-logged
> and this setting is ignored. You can use this setting to test how much
> extra WAL-logging would occur if your database had data checksums
> - enabled.
> + disabled.
> </para>
It seems to me that the point if that enabling wal_log_hints is able
to emulate how much WAL would be generated should data checksums be
*enabled*. So the original text looks correct to me.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-11-19 01:15:28 | Re: Making error message more user-friendly with spaces in a URI |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-11-19 01:09:57 | Re: fix deprecation mention for age() and mxid_age() |