From: | Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Document for wal_log_hints |
Date: | 2024-11-19 02:19:04 |
Message-ID: | 87zflw7yp3.fsf@163.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 09:03:57AM +0800, Andy Fan wrote:
>> So if data checksums is enabled, nothing can be tested when turning
>> wal_log_hints on/off.
>> @@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ include_dir 'conf.d'
>> If data checksums are enabled, hint bit updates are always WAL-logged
>> and this setting is ignored. You can use this setting to test how much
>> extra WAL-logging would occur if your database had data checksums
>> - enabled.
>> + disabled.
>> </para>
>
> It seems to me that the point if that enabling wal_log_hints is able
> to emulate how much WAL would be generated should data checksums be
> *enabled*. So the original text looks correct to me.
OK.. your explainatin looks good to me. so we should keep the original
one. Thanks for the check!
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2024-11-19 02:29:07 | Re: Doc: typo in config.sgml |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-11-19 01:47:53 | Re: per backend I/O statistics |