Re: Fix for pageinspect bug in PG 17

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix for pageinspect bug in PG 17
Date: 2024-11-14 01:13:49
Message-ID: ZzVOzY92ty_FfVUW@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 07:54:03PM -0500, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 7:48 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> 691e8b2e18 is not something I would have done when it comes to
>> pageinspect, FWIW. There is the superuser argument for this module,
>> so I'd vote for an error and apply the same policy across all branches
>> as a matter of consistency.
>
> 691e8b2e18 was the one that threw the error?

Oops. Sorry about that. I meant c788115b5eb5 in this sentence, not
691e8b2e18.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2024-11-14 01:20:14 Re: Some dead code in get_param_path_clause_serials()
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-11-14 01:11:41 Re: [PATCH] Refactor SLRU to always use long file names