Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date: 2024-10-31 22:58:42
Message-ID: ZyQLokM-q1F4B9sw@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:26:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd be okay with adding it in a form where the default behavior
> is to do no additional checking. Whether that's worth maintaining
> is hard to say though.

In terms of maintenance, it would be nice if we are able to minimize
the code added to the pg_upgrade suite, so as it would be simple to
switch this code elsewhere if need be.

I'd imagine a couple of new routines, in the lines of:
- Dump of a database into an output file given in input, as a routine
of Cluster.pm so as it is possible to do dumps from different major
versions. Format should be defined in input.
- Restore to a database from an input file, also as a routine of
Cluster.pm, for the major version argument.
- Filter of the dumps for the contents where column ordering is
inconsistent up at restore. In a new module.
- Comparison of two dumps, with potentially filters applied to them,
with diff printed. In a new module.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-10-31 23:00:47 Re: UUID v7
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2024-10-31 22:30:02 Re: Count and log pages set all-frozen by vacuum