Re: sunsetting md5 password support

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sunsetting md5 password support
Date: 2024-10-10 21:03:37
Message-ID: ZwhBKeNztHPj0Rzg@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:30:15PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 21:55, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > In this message, I propose a multi-year, incremental approach to remove MD5
> > password support from Postgres.
>
> +many for the general idea
>
> I think it makes sense to also remove the "password" authentication
> option while we're at it (this can currently be used with SCRAM stored
> passwords).

I remember "password" as being recommended for SSL connections where
there is no risk of the password contents being seen.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-10-10 21:04:46 Re: Converting tab-complete.c's else-if chain to a switch
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2024-10-10 20:35:42 Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions