Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Ebru Aydin Gol <ebruaydin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date: 2024-10-10 20:35:42
Message-ID: F797F3ED-25E6-450C-9ED2-2E78F6FCA67D@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 10, 2024, at 13:20, Ebru Aydin Gol <ebruaydin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Thanks for your efforts, a secondary directory for extensions is a very useful feature.
>
> Is there any updates on the patch?

There haven't been, no, but your reply has chastened me! I’ve now started a separate thread[1] proposing directory-based extension packaging, as promised up-thread.

Best,

David

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2CAD6FA7-DC25-48FC-80F2-8F203DECAE6A%40justatheory.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-10-10 21:03:37 Re: sunsetting md5 password support
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2024-10-10 20:34:08 RFC: Extension Packaging & Lookup