Re: Avoiding superfluous buffer locking during nbtree backwards scans

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Avoiding superfluous buffer locking during nbtree backwards scans
Date: 2024-10-08 02:14:16
Message-ID: ZwSVeNTWr4v7a_Le@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:31:55PM +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> I noticed I attached an older version of the patch which still had 1
> assertion failure case remaining (thanks cfbot), so here's v3 which
> solves that problem.

Peter G., this is in your area of expertise. Could you look at what
Matthias has proposed?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2024-10-08 03:11:35 RE: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-08 02:05:59 Re: WIP: parallel GiST index builds