Re: Improve EXPLAIN output for multicolumn B-Tree Index

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiro(dot)Ikeda(at)nttdata(dot)com
Cc: boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com, postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Masao(dot)Fujii(at)nttdata(dot)com
Subject: Re: Improve EXPLAIN output for multicolumn B-Tree Index
Date: 2024-10-08 01:50:20
Message-ID: ZwSP3JyoByW9MOui@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 03:44:01AM +0000, Masahiro(dot)Ikeda(at)nttdata(dot)com wrote:
> Although I plan to support "Rows Removed by Non Key Filtered"(or "Skip Scan Filtered"),
> I'd like to know whether the current direction is good. One of my concerns is there might
> be a better way to exact quals for boundary conditions in btexplain().

The CF bot is red for some time now, please provide a rebase.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-08 01:53:40 Re: Assorted style changes with a tiny improvement
Previous Message Erik Wienhold 2024-10-08 01:50:09 Re: pgindent fails with perl 5.40