Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold
Date: 2024-09-20 04:30:46
Message-ID: Zuz6drGzEILysDAO@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 11:51:49AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> Should you also bump the catalog version?

No need to worry about that when sending a patch because committers
take care of that when merging a patch into the tree. Doing that in
each patch submitted just creates more conflicts and work for patch
authors because they'd need to recolve conflicts each time a
catversion bump happens. And that can happen on a daily basis
sometimes depending on what is committed.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-09-20 04:32:06 Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-09-20 04:26:49 Re: per backend I/O statistics