Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold

From: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold
Date: 2024-09-20 03:51:49
Message-ID: CAEG8a3KQyeNvezSS3M3qAHykaDV9uPvTDp9i9+g+GvvDS4W7ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:11 AM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:35 PM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > The last time this was discussed, I think the conclusion was
> > > we should remove attndims and typndims entirely on the grounds
> > > that they're useless. I certainly don't see a point in adding
> > > more logic that could give the misleading impression that they
> > > mean something.
> > >
>
>
> attached patch removes attndims and typndims entirely.
> some tests skipped in my local my machine, not skipped are all OK.

Should you also bump the catalog version?

--
Regards
Junwang Zhao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-09-20 03:53:43 Re: per backend I/O statistics
Previous Message jian he 2024-09-20 03:34:15 Re: not null constraints, again