Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date: 2024-09-19 01:09:27
Message-ID: Zut5xzvLjYlI2Lte@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 05:33:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 10:01:28AM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>> Another new API that is useful for extension authors is the following
>> one (I'm obviously biased since I'm the author, and I don't know if
>> there's still time):
>>
>> Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.
>
> Can someone else comment on the idea of adding this release note item?
> I don't feel confident in my ability to evaluate this. I obviously did
> not see it as significant the first time.

I'm not sure precisely what criteria you use to choose what goes in the
release notes, but this one seems like a judgement call to me. My initial
reaction is that it shouldn't be included, but I do see some items with a
similar scope, such as "Remove some SPI macros."

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-09-19 01:16:03 Re: Using per-transaction memory contexts for storing decoded tuples
Previous Message David Rowley 2024-09-19 00:49:31 Re: Add memory/disk usage for WindowAgg nodes in EXPLAIN