Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date: 2024-09-19 16:23:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZgt6eJfua9hgYRs_yoUq+mo6MYxsKqHGHTxRpqthGV8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 9:09 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 05:33:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 10:01:28AM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> >> Another new API that is useful for extension authors is the following
> >> one (I'm obviously biased since I'm the author, and I don't know if
> >> there's still time):
> >>
> >> Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.
> >
> > Can someone else comment on the idea of adding this release note item?
> > I don't feel confident in my ability to evaluate this. I obviously did
> > not see it as significant the first time.
>
> I'm not sure precisely what criteria you use to choose what goes in the
> release notes, but this one seems like a judgement call to me. My initial
> reaction is that it shouldn't be included, but I do see some items with a
> similar scope, such as "Remove some SPI macros."

I wouldn't mention either this or "Remove some unused SPI macros".

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-09-19 17:03:18 Re: Using per-transaction memory contexts for storing decoded tuples
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-09-19 16:11:34 Re: macOS Ventura won't generate core dumps