| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Perl scripts: eliminate "Useless interpolation" warnings |
| Date: | 2024-09-15 20:36:56 |
| Message-ID: | ZudFaDhhXHg3AAlv@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 04:33:49PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I understand perfectly what the warning is about.
>
> But the project's perlcritic policy is expressed at src/tools/perlcheck/
> perlcriticrc. It's basically severity 5 plus some additions and one exception.
> We shouldn't be imposing our personal perlcritic policies on the project.
>
> The change isn't bad in itself, but there shouldn't be any expectation that we
> will keep to this policy, as it's not required by project policy.
>
> There is a huge mass of perlcritic issues in our perl code at severity 1 (over
> 13000 by my count). If we're going to clean them up (which I would oppose) we
> should do it in a systematic way. It's hard to see why this one is special.
I guess it is special only because my policy is more strict so I wanted
my new code to match. Should I revert it? Is the very tiny improvement
not worth the churn in the code?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2024-09-15 22:07:21 | Re: pgsql: Perl scripts: eliminate "Useless interpolation" warnings |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2024-09-15 20:33:49 | Re: pgsql: Perl scripts: eliminate "Useless interpolation" warnings |