Re: Pgstattuple on Sequences: Seeking Community Feedback on Potential Patch

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pgstattuple on Sequences: Seeking Community Feedback on Potential Patch
Date: 2024-09-12 21:39:14
Message-ID: ZuNfgqVMc2O9XQN6@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:19:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
>> As for patch v3, that seems fine with me.
>
> +1 from here as well, after looking at what v3 is doing for these two
> modules.

Committed.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-09-12 21:40:47 Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-09-12 21:33:46 Mutable foreign key constraints