| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pgstattuple on Sequences: Seeking Community Feedback on Potential Patch |
| Date: | 2024-09-12 02:19:00 |
| Message-ID: | ZuJPlHWN6HOO9AYD@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:36, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Barring objections, I'm planning to commit v3 soon. Robert/Matthias, I'm
> > not sure you are convinced this is the right thing to do (or worth doing,
> > rather), but I don't sense that you are actually opposed to it, either.
> > Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Correct: I do think making heapam-related inspection functions have a
> consistent behaviour when applied to sequences is beneficial, with no
> preference towards specifically supporting or not supporting sequences
> in these functions. If people that work on sequences think it's better
> to also support inspection of sequences, then I think that's a good
> reason to add that support where it doesn't already exist.
>
> As for patch v3, that seems fine with me.
+1 from here as well, after looking at what v3 is doing for these two
modules.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2024-09-12 02:24:52 | Re: json_query conditional wrapper bug |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-09-12 02:11:35 | Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options |